Author

Andrew, Merrindahl

Date
Description
Feminism is often blamed for having made the 'wrong decisions' on issues such as work and care. This thesis argues that such judgements are based on a misperception of how social movements exercise collective agency. While feminist historiography and social movement studies offer some insights, neither directly address the question of to what extent the directions taken by social movements can be shaped by high level strategic decision-making. In answering this question, the research was informed by philosophical pragmatism and by feminist theories of responsibility and reason. The prevailing 'movement CEO' image of decision-making was rejected in favour of an approach directed to interpreting the past actions of the women’s movement without neglecting its decentralised and collective nature. ¶ ...
GUID
oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/49281
Identifier
oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/49281
Identifiers
b23912066
http://hdl.handle.net/1885/49281
10.25911/5d7a2c39656a5
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/49281/6/02whole.pdf.jpg
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/49281/7/01front.pdf.jpg
Publication Date
Titles
Social Movements and the Limits of Strategy: How Australian Feminists Formed Positions on Work and Care